Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Alienware Aurora-R4 (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware 07JNH0
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '17 at 14:55
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 128 63% 99.8 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 409 43% 342 Pts	64-Core 415 26% 415 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.69 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 121 Reflection 137 Parallax 120 98% 126 fps	Gravity 125 Splatting 102 99% 113 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256 256GB 572 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10D Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 485 Write 414 Mixed 440 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 61.1 4K Mixed 17.5 95% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 17.5 52% 105 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 504GB free Firmware: CC54 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 99.3 Write 105 Mixed 89.2 74% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.18 79% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 390GB free Firmware: CC47 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Read 154 Write 157 Mixed 124 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.31 83% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 112%
Mass Storage Device 128GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 53GB free, PID 125c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 15.4 Mixed 16.6 22% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.39 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 1.17 115% 2.44 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 4x4GB 553 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 26.6 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.4 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 65.1 61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 47%

Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	579x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	451x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	232x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	124x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	92x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	91x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	53x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	51x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	123x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 3,272 samples	58x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $262

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16