Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '17 at 18:15
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 84.7 1-Core 121 2-Core 227 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 769 72% 600 Pts	64-Core 1,016 63% 1,016 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	59% Above average	Lighting 75.5 Reflection 73.7 Parallax 72.6 62% 73.9 fps	MRender 74 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 59.7 54% 67.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 500GB 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 280GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 413 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 159 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 64 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1544223901	138% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 496 Mixed 506 113% 505 MB/s	4K Read 48.5 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 64.1 230% 84.6 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 142 167% 289 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 135%
Samsung SSD 500GB 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 64GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 562 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 260 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 59 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 90 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1591400442	139% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 498 Mixed 506 113% 505 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 65.5 233% 84.5 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 157 174% 294 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 135%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 185GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 124 8100 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6708 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13289 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4275 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1840 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6708 (C2) HDA temperature 128 99 22 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 93 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50.1% Above average	Read 89.6 Write 84.8 Mixed 80.2 64% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2.14 4K Mixed 0.29 95% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 393GB free, PID a100 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 70.1 Write 75.8 Mixed 19.7 67% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.19 56% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 43%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 21GB free, PID 1327 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	9.13% Terrible	Read 25.9 Write 14.4 Mixed 11.5 20% 17.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.18 4K Write 0.33 4K Mixed 0.12 34% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.13% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560 34,441 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 3 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.7% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	4,760x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1,042x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	478x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,355x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	809x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	399x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	346x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	295x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	281x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	405x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	329x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	264x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16