Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP700Z5C-S03PT
Memory	5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131104
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '17 at 09:45
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	33%
CPU Throttled	49%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3635QM 2,986 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Memory 64 1-Core 33.1 2-Core 64 36% 53.7 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 161 16% 131 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0D5) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.19% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 6.23 Parallax 1.62 2% 3.42 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.06 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.19% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 119829588475702 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1500 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 325 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 325 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 712458 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 53 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 712458 (F2) Unknown 100 100 811298 (F9) Unknown 100 100 25379	50.7% Above average	Read 485 Write 235 Mixed 301 75% 340 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 10.2 52% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 22.3 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 32.4 26% 35 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 95%
Sandisk i100 8GB 268 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 0GB free Firmware: 11.56.04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7948 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1511 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 5 (AE) Unknown 100 100 239 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 16 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 22 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2901044 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4286902	12.2% Very poor	Read 112 Write 26 Mixed 42.8 13% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 3.29 4K Mixed 2.7 22% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 17%
ASMT 2105 750GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 251GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 75.6 Write 65.5 Mixed 35.7 71% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.13 54% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 12GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11.7 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 7.1 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700Z3C/700Z5C Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

CPU
Core i7-3635QMIntelBench 62%, 2,986 samples	70x
Core i7-3615QMIntelBench 62%, 2,657 samples	67x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	23x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	128x
GeForce GT 640MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,728 samples	25x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	7x

SSD
i100 8GBSandiskBench 15%, 268 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 740 samples	54x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 52%, 289 samples	17x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 49%, 276 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16