Samsung 900X5L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 900X5L  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT900X5L-L24S
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170320
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '17 at 08:22
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4405U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 114
51% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 187
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 510
Sanyo(144D C138) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4565
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.7% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 1.53
1% 1.85 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.37
Splatting 4.22
2% 2.88 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.7%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D128 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T872004 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 470
Write 151
Mixed 166
57% 263 MB/s
4K Read 7.22
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 11.6
45% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 39.1
DQ Mixed 4.88
11% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E8E324EB-EGCF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 900X5L Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X5L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback