Asrock EP2C602

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock EP2C602 (all builds)
Memory	57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '17 at 15:31
Run Duration	298 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 884 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	50% Average	Memory 56.8 1-Core 58 2-Core 116 45% 76.9 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 464 41% 348 Pts	64-Core 1,191 74% 1,191 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing below potential (99^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)	57.8% Above average	Lighting 71.2 Reflection 70.6 Parallax 62.7 58% 68.2 fps	MRender 72.2 Gravity 67.7 Splatting 70.8 58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	176% Outstanding	Read 1,055 Write 1,253 Mixed 1,039 250% 1,116 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 71.9 4K Mixed 41 150% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 115 120% 199 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 176% Great: 283%
Team L5 SSD 120G 120GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 31GB free Firmware: 4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 114 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1216 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 297 (A3) Unknown 100 100 13 (A4) Unknown 100 100 53987 (A5) Unknown 100 100 102 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 25 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 68 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 4150 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 60989 (F2) Unknown 100 100 77918 (F5) Unknown 100 100 107974	57.7% Above average	Read 405 Write 133 Mixed 200 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 23.1 83% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 58.6 75% 136 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 5GB free Firmware: EMT0 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 423 Write 395 Mixed 407 91% 408 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 17.1 70% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 66.3 73% 125 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 124%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: 80.0 Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 105 Write 110 Mixed 110 82% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.29 111% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 356GB free Firmware: CC45 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 86.9 Write 76.2 Mixed 78.1 61% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.53 104% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 69%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 39GB free Firmware: 1C03 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 73 (03) Spinup time 188 175 5591 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5424 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 2 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32138 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 848 (BE) vendor-specific 59 32 41 (C2) HDA temperature 109 82 41 (C4) Reallocation count 198 198 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 182 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 183 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 39 (C8) Write error rate 200 183 0	21.5% Poor	Read 48.1 Write 26.8 Mixed 34.8 28% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.19 45% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 35%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 12GB free Firmware: 3V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 6 (03) Spinup time 194 192 3275 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2393 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 7 7 67965 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1296 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 570 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2400 (C2) HDA temperature 115 94 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 26 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.5% Average	Read 77.6 Write 80.4 Mixed 78.7 60% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.52 4K Mixed 0.64 156% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 68%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 9GB free Firmware: 03.0 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 85.4 Write 103 Mixed 90.6 70% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.71 4K Mixed 0.61 155% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C10 8x8GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	84.8% Excellent	MC Read 40.1 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 34 101% 35.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.1 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EP2C602 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	8x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	6x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	5x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	4x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	3x
900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GBIntel $160Bench 440%, 3,427 samples	3x
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	2x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70BH0- 32GBSamsungBench 51%, 16 samples	3x
M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 52 samples	3x
HMT42GR7MFR4C 4x16GBHynixBench 72%, 48 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 123% - Outstanding

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16