Fujitsu CELSIUS W380

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W380  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2917-A1
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '17 at 13:31
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 154
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 374
42% 327 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 78.9
Parallax 68
59% 73.2 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 66.7
56% 69.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB
97GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 78
Write 79.5
Mixed 79.1
60% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.33
86% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
42GB free
Firmware: JP1OA3CF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 94.2
Mixed 16
49% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP1OA3CF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 73.1
Write 75
Mixed 21.4
41% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.31
71% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5773DH0-CH9 02FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 80CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 02FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.9% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W380 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $149
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback