Asus G53JW

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus G53JW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G53JW
Memory	1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '17 at 22:54
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 75.4 2-Core 128 63% 98.9 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 238 28% 216 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 2043) 1.5GB CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	7.3% Terrible	Lighting 8.27 Reflection 9.73 Parallax 7.78 7% 8.59 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 10.9 8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.3% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8736 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1075 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 52 (AE) Unknown 100 100 65 (B5) Unknown 100 100 4578458141386 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 119 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	33.4% Below average	Read 264 Write 176 Mixed 213 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 15.1 4K Mixed 4.17 31% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 20.9 DQ Mixed 6.78 22% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 72%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$60 4,559 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 205GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 542 (03) Spinup time 172 169 2375 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3484 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12134 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1738 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 914 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 96 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 152 152 144420 (C2) HDA temperature 106 94 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	57.4% Above average	Read 104 Write 96.2 Mixed 68.5 67% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.48 117% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF1339.C16F 1x4GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	27.4% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 7 23% 7.93 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G53JW Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G53JW

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	31x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	3x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	38x

SSD
ARC 100 240GBOCZ $120Bench 87%, 11,799 samples	4x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
120GB 120GBTeamBench 90%, 60 samples	2x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GBUnknownBench 37%, 5 samples	4x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 4x2GBAsintBench 40%, 37 samples	3x
SSZ3128M8-EDJED 2x2GBAsintBench 24%, 452 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Average

Total price: $310

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16