PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme3 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150804 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 21 '17 at 15:34 |
Run Duration | 96 Seconds |
Run User | LTU-User |
Background CPU | 84% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.4%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.4%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
45.1%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 88x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 53x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 43x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 15x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $778 |