Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170908
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '17 at 09:56
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 85.7 1-Core 114 2-Core 229 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 912 81% 684 Pts	64-Core 1,259 78% 1,259 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E272) 2GB CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.9.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Lighting 41.3 Reflection 37 Parallax 54 34% 44.1 fps	MRender 32.8 Gravity 34.2 Splatting 42.8 31% 36.6 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: 07TA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 78 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4096 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1941 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1275 (AA) Unknown 100 100 1 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 23 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 3088095183357 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 24590 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 80 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 2070 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	41.2% Average	Read 446 Write 50 Mixed 89.6 42% 195 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 5.09 67% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 49.9 DQ Mixed 6.04 13% 26 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 69%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 175GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3315 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1499 (B1) Unknown 99 99 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 52 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 54 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16186826536	92.6% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 417 Mixed 419 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 78.5 4K Mixed 25.5 141% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 41 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 97.5 80% 109 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 531GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 161 6816 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4420 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7821 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3374 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1141 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 187 187 40796 (C2) HDA temperature 125 105 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.5% Good	Read 115 Write 96.3 Mixed 92 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.17 72% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 67%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154 3,810 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 454GB free Firmware: FP1A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 9001 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 725 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 680 (0A) Spinup retry count 114 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 457 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 5 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 106 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 968 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 240519151644 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 472 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 206 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	80.2% Excellent	Read 137 Write 142 Mixed 120 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.34 117% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 355GB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 213955928 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3801 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 5388779 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6440 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2881 (B7) Unknown 91 91 9 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 3 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 73 51 9044426779 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 234 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 82 82 37582 (C2) HDA temperature 27 49 -140737488355301 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 12 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -10952166601102 (F1) Unknown 100 253 43376781925419 (F2) Unknown 100 253 81273874770052	77.8% Very good	Read 148 Write 124 Mixed 115 96% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.26 74% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 288GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 136 136 34387591584 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1072 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 953 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 586 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1111 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1111 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 214749478939 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.1% Good	Read 118 Write 112 Mixed 104 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.21 97% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 8,117 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 44.9 MC Write 41.4 MC Mixed 33.8 114% 40 GB/s	SC Read 26.7 SC Write 39.4 SC Mixed 30.5 92% 32.2 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16