ADD TO PC
BUILD

Zoostorm 7200-9075A

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Zoostorm 7200-9075A (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook N15_17RD,RD2
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '17 at 14:19
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 110 2-Core 207 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 539 57% 455 Pts	64-Core 551 34% 551 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Clevo(1558 0152) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7654 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 17 Parallax 19.3 18% 19.7 fps	MRender 24.5 Gravity 23 Splatting 16.7 17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT256G1122 256GB 1,971 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2333000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 12 100 12 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 216 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 19 (A9) Unknown 100 100 27 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 10 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 100 223338299431 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 42 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1669 (F1) Unknown 253 253 761 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1429	60.1% Good	Read 472 Write 320 Mixed 378 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 70.6 4K Mixed 3.7 72% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 18.7 DQ Write 69.3 DQ Mixed 14.8 20% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 180 1800 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 558 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 30 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 33 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 18 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1245 (C2) HDA temperature 120 101 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	63.1% Good	Read 111 Write 109 Mixed 109 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.18 78% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GB 9,135 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 17.9 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 20.6 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback