Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '17 at 11:27
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 184
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 313
40% 302 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.10.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.9% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 70.1
45% 63.1 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 52.7
45% 55.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 479
Write 259
Mixed 268
74% 335 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 24.8
114% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 39.2
DQ Write 58.6
DQ Mixed 54
39% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 1 2TB
887GB free
Firmware: JJAOA3NH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 101
Write 93.5
Mixed 91.1
72% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.41
101% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 82%
WD Elements 500GB
9GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 38
Write 32
Mixed 30.9
42% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $526
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback