Asrock 960GM-GS3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 960GM-GS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110922
Uptime19.7 Days
Run DateSep 07 '17 at 13:09
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 93.4
48% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 171
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Asus(1043 03D4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 20.2
22% 21.9 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 24.9
17% 20.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 214
Write 129
Mixed 95.9
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 11.6
49% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 13.4
15% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 48%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
12GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 217
Write 175
Mixed 199
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 11.1
54% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.7
DQ Write 44.4
DQ Mixed 10.5
14% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 86%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
93GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 62
Write 44
Mixed 53.1
40% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.24
79% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.9
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GM-GS3 FX Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-GS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $273
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback