HP 810-019eb

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP 810-019eb (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141024
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '17 at 09:20
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 77.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 194 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 510 53% 427 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50% Average	Lighting 62 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 60.5 50% 63.3 fps	MRender 68.8 Gravity 60.7 Splatting 53 49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1681 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1568 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 90 90 309 (AE) Unknown 100 100 112 (B5) Unknown 100 100 11630808008806 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 80 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 90 90 10 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	53.6% Above average	Read 425 Write 183 Mixed 258 63% 289 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 5.34 75% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 4.54 31% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 326GB free Firmware: HP33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 159007592 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9347 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 83668436 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 24251 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1566 (B4) Unknown 100 100 460560103 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 62 588906527 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 103 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 69 69 62371 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 47244640287 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	92.8% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 147 Mixed 136 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.22 76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 114%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 77GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 92.8 Write 94.2 Mixed 44.1 95% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.81 4K Mixed 0.34 110% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 4x8GB 1,052 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 15 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 16.2 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 810-019eb Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: HP 810-019eb

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 128GBMicronBench 56%, 11,312 samples	5x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 1,052 samples	5x
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 60%, 1,419 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $192

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16