Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120302
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '17 at 19:26
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
67.8% Good
SC Int 92.5
SC Float 92.8
SC Mixed 91.8
74% 92.4 Pts
QC Int 357
QC Float 353
QC Mixed 355
80% 355 Pts
MC Int 356
MC Float 357
MC Mixed 355
53% 356 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti-$362
MSI(1462 2843) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
39% Below average
Lighting 107
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 136
36% 110 fps
MRender 85.7
Gravity 126
Splatting 66.4
41% 92.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39%
Great: 41%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$140
5GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 399
Write 233
Mixed 230
63% 287 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 11.5
74% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 31.1
DQ Mixed 11.3
14% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 88%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 62.1
Write 50.8
Mixed 80.1
49% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.23
68% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
317GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 144
Write 152
Mixed 42
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.2
68% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85%
Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$78
159GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 75.1
Write 96.3
Mixed 37.8
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.19
67% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
145GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 160
Write 144
Mixed 85.8
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.18
65% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53%
Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $758
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $250AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $180Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $17
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $52Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback