To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130104
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '17 at 10:38
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 180
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 301
48% 346 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Intel(8086 2010) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 1.41
2% 1.72 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 3.7
2% 2.81 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP310 mSATA 128GB-$129
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.6% Average
Read 255
Write 139
Mixed 173
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 17.9
71% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 28.3
59% 120 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 78%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
615GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 82.4
Write 82.5
Mixed 74.2
102% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
57GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 14
Mixed 27.9
31% 27 MB/s
4K Read 6.81
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.62
142% 3.41 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 38%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 8.87
Mixed 9.72
15% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.42
4K Write 0.008
4K Mixed 0.006
17% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-072.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.2
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback