Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '17 at 23:35
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 26%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
SC Int 103
SC Float 109
SC Mixed 108
85% 107 Pts
QC Int 371
QC Float 371
QC Mixed 369
84% 370 Pts
MC Int 777
MC Float 907
MC Mixed 921
130% 868 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
MSI(1462 2840) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.28
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
46.4% Average
Lighting 176
Reflection 85.1
Parallax 134
50% 132 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 129
Splatting 78.2
44% 101 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 45%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$158
43GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance (0th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 356
Write 34.5
Mixed 57.8
32% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.15
1% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 97%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
91GB free
Firmware: V5DOA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 45.7
Write 39.9
Mixed 45
33% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.26
77% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 35%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$90
98GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 103
Write 121
Mixed 114
85% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.42
114% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 84%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$90
38GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 73.4
Write 118
Mixed 108
75% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.39
104% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35
27GB free
Firmware: 0003LVM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 5455 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 49.4
Write 40.5
Mixed 36.4
32% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.15
33% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 26.7
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 80%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 1,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,097
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i5-7600K $180Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $192SanDisk Extreme 64GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $52Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $204SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback