Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '17 at 21:56
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 84.9
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 94
50% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 259
27% 218 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 368.81
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 72.1
Parallax 63.2
55% 67.5 fps
MRender 75.9
Gravity 63
Splatting 61.4
54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 478
Write 352
Mixed 337
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 18.9
101% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 52.2
DQ Mixed 18.7
21% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 124%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 132
Write 100
Mixed 78.8
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.22
86% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
643GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 114
Write 84.6
Mixed 42.2
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.26
92% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 100%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
436GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
55% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 98.7
Mixed 83.3
69% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.13
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55%
Great: 83%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
19GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 96
Write 72.5
Mixed 76.2
61% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.19
72% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.1
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8.3
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-V EVO/USB3 - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $446
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback