PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 36.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A32 |
Motherboard | MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) (all builds) |
Memory | 28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170316 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 17 '17 at 07:24 |
Run Duration | 219 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
30.7%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.28
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
98.2%
Outstanding
|
||||
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
168%
Outstanding
|
|||
98.8%
Outstanding
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4-2400C DDR4 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
41.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 250x |
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 225x |
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 174x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 121x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 115x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $899 |