Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131111
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 13 '17 at 00:33
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 144
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 341
38% 301 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 352.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 43.9
32% 39.6 fps
MRender 48.6
Gravity 34.3
Splatting 37.1
32% 40 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 487
Write 317
Mixed 321
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 18.6
95% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 70.1
DQ Mixed 35.3
44% 79.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
327GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62% Good
Read 106
Write 111
Mixed 96.6
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.29
79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
15GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 58
Write 56
Mixed 54.4
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.29
83% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 13.3
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback