DELL Studio XPS 435T

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	DELL Studio XPS 435T (all builds)
Motherboard	DELL 0X501H
Memory	2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090206
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '17 at 18:53
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 90.3 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 127 59% 94.2 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 306 28% 233 Pts	64-Core 335 21% 335 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 838B) 1GB CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 19.7 Reflection 23.4 Parallax 18.1 16% 20.4 fps	MRender 27 Gravity 20.7 Splatting 21.7 19% 23.1 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7139 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1249 (B1) Unknown 91 91 98 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 56 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 21 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19539930303	38.2% Below average	Read 262 Write 112 Mixed 139 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 8.94 66% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 19.8 DQ Write 60.1 DQ Mixed 8.75 16% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 73%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 533GB free Firmware: 1AA01117 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 5170 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6384 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 11830 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 29022 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6295 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 60 571801634 (C2) HDA temperature 62 59 638910502 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 223233 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	64.5% Good	Read 106 Write 118 Mixed 77.6 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.51 121% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 63%
WD My Book 1235 4TB 2,399 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 207GB free, PID 1235 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 27.9 Mixed 25 35% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.25 59% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x1GB 2,345 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 6 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.2% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 15.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 10.8 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 435T Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	31x
Core i7 940Intel $150Bench 66%, 2,107 samples	6x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	9x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	13x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	6x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $715

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16