Asus H81M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20161021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '17 at 22:07
Run Duration	84 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4170-$59 48,178 User benchmarks, average bench 57% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 199 79% 134 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 293 39% 292 Pts	64-Core 293 18% 293 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Sapphire(174B 2015) Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 16.150.2401.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Lighting 29.8 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 35.7 24% 32.5 fps	MRender 28.3 Gravity 23.8 Splatting 37.5 25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 23%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3149 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 845 (B1) Unknown 96 96 70 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 43 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 112 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22116258013	116% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 415 Mixed 417 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 46.2 4K Write 94.2 4K Mixed 48.1 182% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 113 144% 258 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GB 3,140 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 59.4 67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	459x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	299x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	201x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	172x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16