Asus X99-E-10G WS

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E-10G WS (all builds)
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160701
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '17 at 18:25
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 112 2-Core 223 81% 141 Pts	4-Core 471 8-Core 732 74% 602 Pts	64-Core 919 57% 919 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% EVGA(3842 2774) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	37% Below average	Lighting 44.6 Reflection 40.6 Parallax 53.4 36% 46.2 fps	MRender 54.6 Gravity 51.4 Splatting 37.7 38% 47.9 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 23692 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 158 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 23 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20062146603	84.5% Excellent	Read 495 Write 323 Mixed 356 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 23.9 116% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 76.1 101% 185 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 462GB free Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 93995704 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 448 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 21501346844 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21814 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 264 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 46 538574878 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 39 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 76 76 49147 (C2) HDA temperature 30 54 77309411358 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 513 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 29351806507362 (F1) Unknown 100 253 41688512006 (F2) Unknown 100 253 37794549746	68.9% Good	Read 124 Write 116 Mixed 111 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.31 80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 113%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 332GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8291 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 52 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3799 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 50 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 29 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 22 (C2) HDA temperature 111 101 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.7% Average	Read 86.8 Write 82.3 Mixed 84.9 64% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.04 4K Write 2.66 4K Mixed 0.53 152% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB 6,687 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.3% Very good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 22.7 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 19 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E-10G WS Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus X99-E-10G WS

CPU
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	16x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	13x
Xeon E5-2690 v4IntelBench 76%, 795 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	24x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	8x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,280Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	6x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	6x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	5x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	5x

RAM
Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 8x8GBCorsairBench 124%, 153 samples	8x
M391A1K43BB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 34 samples	4x
16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 2x16GBMicronBench 73%, 274 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,154

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16