Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '17 at 17:41
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 104 2-Core 174 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 656 61% 507 Pts	64-Core 1182 73% 1182 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Device(0000 0000) 3GB CLim: 1349 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Lighting 71.3 Reflection 69.6 Parallax 88.3 58% 76.4 fps	MRender 82.1 Gravity 78.3 Splatting 50.8 56% 70.4 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18152 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2233 (B1) Unknown 78 78 257 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 35 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 1 1 186871 (EB) Unknown 99 99 239 (F1) Unknown 99 99 67339449340	84.5% Excellent	Read 506 Write 339 Mixed 343 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 24.3 123% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 33.6 60% 120 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 118%
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB 5,978 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 149GB free Firmware: P0330AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 176 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 755 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 43 (A3) Unknown 100 100 551 (A4) Unknown 100 100 5223 (A5) Unknown 100 100 14 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 4 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 2 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 63 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 44131428859934 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 41850 (F2) Unknown 100 100 108316 (F5) Unknown 100 100 61696	68.7% Good	Read 487 Write 247 Mixed 264 73% 333 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 22.5 92% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 94.4 DQ Mixed 44.6 58% 108 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 95%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250 686 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 432GB free Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 10241 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 657 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 3773 (0A) Spinup retry count 113 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 654 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 13 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 95 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1078 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 223339216935 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 6071 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 91 91 3669 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 540 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	77.1% Very good	Read 137 Write 131 Mixed 129 100% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.47 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.33 138% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 129GB free Firmware: MJAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 125 125 51579978343 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2252 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18284 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2171 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2544 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2544 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 266288889896 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.4% Good	Read 103 Write 108 Mixed 129 86% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.22 84% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL17-18-18 D4-3600 4x4GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 41.9 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 36.8 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 37.3 SC Mixed 29.3 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16