Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard Easynote TE69BM (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard Easynote TE69BM
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '17 at 16:41
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2820-$139 2,102 User benchmarks, average bench 27% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	29% Poor	Memory 52.9 1-Core 20 2-Core 29.2 26% 34 Pts	4-Core 32.4 8-Core 33.6 4% 33 Pts	64-Core 37.7 2% 37.7 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0845) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.76% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.89 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.19 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.76% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 259GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT001L Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1226 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2543 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 4633 (0A) Spinup retry count 150 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2538 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 7 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 2450 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3257 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 214748954668 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 77 (DE) Loaded hours 90 90 4323 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 257 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	45.7% Average	Read 77.8 Write 81.2 Mixed 79.1 60% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.14 60% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GB 6,155 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.73 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2820Intel $139Bench 27%, 2,102 samples	17x
Celeron N2920IntelBench 31%, 1,586 samples	16x
Pentium N3520IntelBench 34%, 2,090 samples	5x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	38x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
RBUSC180DS37256GH 256GBKingstonBench 61%, 337 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	7x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 7,765 samples	6x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	6x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $239

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16