Asrock B250M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B250M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '17 at 22:04
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 94.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 226 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 462 60% 454 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	32.4% Below average	Lighting 40.7 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 38.4 33% 37 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 37.1 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 233GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	232% Outstanding	Read 2,234 Write 1,171 Mixed 1,254 342% 1,553 MB/s	4K Read 52.4 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 40.3 189% 67.5 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 146 157% 265 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 232% Great: 236%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 7861105 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 -47029891886029 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1095 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 173 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 50 64427786266 (C2) HDA temperature 26 50 64427786266 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7861105 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7861105 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7861105 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 94 94 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 33474 (EA) Unknown 0 0 24515 (F1) Unknown 0 0 24515 (F2) Unknown 0 0 26709 (F4) Unknown 91 91 17694990	55.9% Above average	Read 437 Write 116 Mixed 154 51% 236 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 87.2 4K Mixed 14.4 94% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 67.5 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 28.7 39% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 405GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 90 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 100 94 (03) Spinup time 123 100 17199989044 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1922 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12676 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1170 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 94 48694662 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 58 404357146 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1946 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1946 (C2) HDA temperature 230 146 180389412890 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.5% Good	Read 117 Write 115 Mixed 103 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.29 72% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 1x8GB 10,361 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.9% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 12.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 13.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 58.5 68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B250M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B250M-HDV - $52

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	236x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	212x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	147x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	162x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	113x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	92x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 72%, 21,822 samples	75x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $306

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16