Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 81.9 1-Core 87.2 2-Core 174 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 636 58% 487 Pts	64-Core 1,618 100% 1,618 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 146 Parallax 127 110% 136 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 139 Splatting 109 98% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT1050MX 1TB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 894GB free (System drive) Firmware: R040 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 472 Write 487 Mixed 484 108% 481 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 27.4 83% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 20 DQ Write 59.9 DQ Mixed 14.8 18% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 99%
Hds722020ala330 RSD HUA 2TB 1,166 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAOA31D Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 131072 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 105 (03) Spinup time 117 117 51579912808 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 570 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 112 112 39 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 45613 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 299 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 577 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 577 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 317828300829 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	60.4% Good	Read 110 Write 101 Mixed 95.6 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.45 100% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Nanya NT8GC72C4NG0NK-CG M393B1K70DH0-YH9 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.3% Good	MC Read 46.6 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 16.9 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.8 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16