User System

Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 86% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	EVGA Default string
Motherboard	EVGA 131-HE-E095
Memory	40.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '17 at 03:45
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 96.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 233 86% 150 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 780 76% 624 Pts	64-Core 949 59% 949 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6390) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.9% Outstanding	Lighting 155 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 44.5 126% 84.8 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 47.3 Splatting 61.7 48% 58.7 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 161GB free Firmware: X35510RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 8402 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 686 (A5) Unknown 100 100 64437682341 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 25 (A8) Unknown 100 100 14 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 5 (AE) Unknown 100 100 231 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 48 206159413283 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 115968770119 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 5062 (EA) Unknown 100 100 7015 (F1) Unknown 253 253 6096 (F2) Unknown 253 253 16787 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	53.5% Above average	Read 486 Write 229 Mixed 267 72% 327 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 9.66 64% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 23.1 DQ Write 44.2 DQ Mixed 34.7 26% 34 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11167 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1157 (B1) Unknown 96 96 203 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 48 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 287 (F1) Unknown 99 99 43122763022	87.2% Excellent	Read 515 Write 488 Mixed 505 112% 502 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 66.4 4K Mixed 20.7 98% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 30.1 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 25.9 63% 122 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 4x16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 45.3 MC Write 57.5 MC Mixed 46.5 142% 49.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 20.6 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 51.8 77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 153%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)