PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock X99 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160603 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 19 '17 at 22:40 |
Run Duration | 298 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
|
73.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 340.84
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
||||
USB2.0 Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 3234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
3.85%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.M8FB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
57.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 464x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 108x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $235Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 84x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 75x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $997 |