Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '17 at 13:45
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 234
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 666
70% 559 Pts
64-Core 673
42% 673 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 366E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.7% Good
Lighting 90.6
Reflection 88.2
Parallax 77.7
74% 85.5 fps
MRender 81
Gravity 78.1
Splatting 69.5
62% 76.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 729
Write 548
Mixed 561
136% 613 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 23.8
170% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 56.3
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 23.8
64% 128 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 120%
Great: 236%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
111GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 503
Write 131
Mixed 190
60% 275 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 10.6
116% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 28.6
73% 160 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
108GB free
Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 178
Write 107
Mixed 119
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 13.8
100% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 97
DQ Write 99
DQ Mixed 27.9
40% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 191
Mixed 167
139% 185 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 2.81
4K Mixed 0.38
149% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 111%
Great: 109%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
675GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 171
Write 135
Mixed 131
109% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.2
101% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 112%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
283GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 65
Mixed 64.5
48% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.44
108% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $642
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback