Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 88% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170424
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '17 at 22:16
Run Duration	362 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 140 2-Core 265 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 772 73% 606 Pts	64-Core 771 48% 771 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8592) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 147 Parallax 124 110% 135 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 128 Splatting 106 94% 116 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221 10,770 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2320000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 52 100 820 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1049 (A6) Unknown 100 100 119 (A7) Unknown 100 100 1 (A8) Unknown 100 100 170 (A9) Unknown 100 100 373 (AA) Unknown 100 100 1 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 178 (AE) Unknown 100 100 97 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 56 100 279172874284 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 3 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1378 (E8) Unknown 100 100 99 (E9) Unknown 100 100 31446 (F1) Unknown 253 253 23168 (F2) Unknown 253 253 11387	73.5% Very good	Read 479 Write 325 Mixed 387 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 94.6 4K Mixed 3.54 86% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 27.1 83% 176 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 84%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 720GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 11 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 69 67 9477 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8560 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12403 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5894 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 22 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 33 287763267617 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 47 47 28355 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 496 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 8822	64.2% Good	Read 92.9 Write 130 Mixed 107 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.47 121% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 189GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 46193743 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7420 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 346265214 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14055 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 7062 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 71 71 29 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295034012 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 65 37 106270964383779 (C2) HDA temperature 35 63 42949672995 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 23 46193743 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 12 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 28183575429540 (F1) Unknown 100 253 703093778 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1767563930	35.4% Below average	Read 74.5 Write 48.8 Mixed 58.4 46% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.86 4K Mixed 0.34 73% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 68%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB 2,689 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 99GB free, PID 1f05 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 39.9 Write 40.8 Mixed 39.6 52% 40.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.27 63% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 21%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB 4,876 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 26GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	8.9% Terrible	Read 20.9 Write 13.2 Mixed 14.1 19% 16.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.67 4K Write 0.61 4K Mixed 0.68 61% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.9% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-012.A00G 2x8GB 1,882 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 12.4 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	194x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	132x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	130x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	79x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	48x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	25x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $508

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16