Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	95.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '17 at 23:19
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Memory 80.1 1-Core 121 2-Core 234 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 854 81% 669 Pts	64-Core 1,313 81% 1,313 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3703) CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2262 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 126 Parallax 107 98% 118 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 109 Splatting 110 90% 110 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2605 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 536 (B1) Unknown 87 87 62 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 47 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 232 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10619986184
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 55GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 25069753 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 -31911606996125 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2959 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 2018 (B1) Unknown 0 0 94 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 44 60132425761 (C2) HDA temperature 33 44 60132425761 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 25069753 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 25069753 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 25069753 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 93 93 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 26890 (EA) Unknown 0 0 20122 (F1) Unknown 0 0 20122 (F2) Unknown 0 0 18643 (F4) Unknown 93 93 196739298	57.9% Above average	Read 514 Write 95.6 Mixed 149 54% 253 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 10.1 99% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 41.6 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 30.7 38% 63.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 819GB free Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 90400352 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5753 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 65 60 249315648143 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12657 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3690 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 214751838288 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 56 4849991711 (C2) HDA temperature 31 44 -140737488355297 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 33 90400352 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -138336601623424 (F1) Unknown 100 253 669614922 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2751852484	117% Outstanding	Read 211 Write 196 Mixed 187 149% 198 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.45 4K Mixed 0.79 162% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 819GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 135 132 4208 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5771 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16700 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4234 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1562 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4208 (C2) HDA temperature 108 94 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	121% Outstanding	Read 217 Write 204 Mixed 173 148% 198 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.68 146% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	MC Read 39.8 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 28.6 96% 33.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 36 SC Mixed 26 81% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)