Biostar TA870U3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar TA870U3+  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110824
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateMay 21 '17 at 01:20
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 91.6
48% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 171
21% 163 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
PwrHis(1787 2311) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 2
2% 2.22 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 1.91
2% 1.86 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
223GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 332
Write 189
Mixed 118
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 8.97
59% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 40.7
DQ Mixed 8.68
14% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
369GB free
Firmware: GS2OA3C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 108
Write 113
Mixed 8.32
55% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.12
33% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
77GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 67.3
Mixed 23.6
36% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.18
77% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 67%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 112
Mixed 80.3
72% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.22
80% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 108%
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB
5GB free
Firmware: 02.05D02 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 47.1
Write 28.9
Mixed 24.5
25% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.39
100% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 32%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
0GB free
Firmware: VM100-33 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 28.8
Mixed 20.1
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.31
77% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 32%
Patriot Memory 32GB
4GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.97% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 13.9
Mixed 13.2
18% 15 MB/s
4K Read 4.34
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 0.03
32% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.97%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA870U3+ Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TA870U3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $240
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback