Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 15 '17 at 20:32
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 78.7 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 939 85% 715 Pts	64-Core 1,328 82% 1,328 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.19 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 178 Parallax 165 127% 166 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 156 Splatting 116 105% 129 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 447GB free Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 691 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 174 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 803 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65540 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 129 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 353	71.4% Very good	Read 516 Write 353 Mixed 348 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 9.46 79% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 45.9 63% 117 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 101%
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 391GB free Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 691 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 172 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 602 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65539 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 129 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 229	68.3% Good	Read 516 Write 353 Mixed 348 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 9.87 80% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 43.3 43% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 101%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	213% Outstanding	Read 2,219 Write 1,147 Mixed 1,145 330% 1,504 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 35.6 155% 52.7 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 69 77% 132 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 213% Great: 236%
PNY CS1311 960GB-$195 1,486 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 135GB free Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7176 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 522 (A8) Unknown 100 100 6 (AA) Unknown 100 100 762 (AD) Unknown 100 100 196623 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 278 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 3 (E7) Temperature 100 100 97 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3501	68.4% Good	Read 514 Write 354 Mixed 355 90% 408 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 10.4 80% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 26.9 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 44.2 43% 64.6 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 490GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 167 6333 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2416 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13601 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 920 (10) Unknown 33 167 583432921431 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 513 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1902 (C2) HDA temperature 120 104 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	70.1% Very good	Read 122 Write 122 Mixed 117 91% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.71 4K Mixed 0.37 127% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 4,091 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	87.5% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 29.9 90% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 26.5 79% 27.8 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)