Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160701
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 10 '17 at 14:02
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 224
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 668
69% 553 Pts
64-Core 843
52% 843 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,750
Write 717
Mixed 1,086
260% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 29
150% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 147
134% 203 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 169%
Great: 283%
WDC WD20 EARS-00J2GB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 106
Write 93.2
Mixed 96.6
125% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.21
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 38%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
295GB free, PID 0101
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 66.4
Write 70.1
Mixed 54.3
81% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.18
57% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 44%
WDC WD20 EARS-00S8B1 2TB
98GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 88.3
Write 91.9
Mixed 68.6
106% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.11
52% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 41%
WDC WD20 EADS-00R6B0 2TB
78GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 85.4
Write 80
Mixed 56.6
92% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.23
54% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34%
Great: 35%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
56GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 249
Write 129
Mixed 113
185% 164 MB/s
4K Read 9.29
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 4.29
497% 7.63 MB/s
DQ Read 10.3
DQ Write 9.74
DQ Mixed 4.32
516% 8.12 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 111%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
29GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 99.4
Write 84.8
Mixed 68
104% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.16
68% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
100% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 41.6
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 20.1
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 100%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $923
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback