Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H87 Performance (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160114
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '17 at 09:28
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 206 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 548 57% 459 Pts	64-Core 531 33% 531 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 78%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 370F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 372.54 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 157 Parallax 147 115% 148 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 151 Splatting 113 103% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 372.54 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	64.7% Good	Lighting 78.9 Reflection 90.2 Parallax 80.3 64% 83.1 fps	MRender 76.3 Gravity 81.6 Splatting 81.6 66% 79.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1202 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 116 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 44 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3099265618	109% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 397 Mixed 410 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 85.1 4K Mixed 46.6 169% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 115 133% 231 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 134%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 116 (03) Spinup time 100 100 38654705664 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 7 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 117 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 58 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 58 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 180389675042 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	82.4% Excellent	Read 143 Write 145 Mixed 138 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.42 110% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 97%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 150755736 (03) Spinup time 92 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9747 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 4321262631 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 26586 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 404 (B7) Unknown 80 80 20 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295032916 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 70 50 47748939806 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 298 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 57 57 87602 (C2) HDA temperature 30 50 -140737488355298 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 87 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -20697447391669 (F1) Unknown 100 253 22653763448 (F2) Unknown 100 253 43158412344	73.5% Very good	Read 124 Write 133 Mixed 120 94% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.21 73% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 96%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 3TB 2,213 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 118 Write 102 Mixed 81.2 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.27 79% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 31385928 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13332 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 19847262 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 22820 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 331 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295098370 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 47782494240 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 261 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 209736 (C2) HDA temperature 32 44 -140737488355296 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 96391951033267 (F1) Unknown 100 253 8486263739 (F2) Unknown 100 253 19311440723	68% Good	Read 124 Write 113 Mixed 110 87% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.29 96% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB 1,459 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.1% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 14.8 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 16.4 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

CPU
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	65x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	63x
Core i5-4670KIntel $127Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	12x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GBMicronBench 49%, 25 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $421

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16