Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 19 '17 at 02:02
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 136
60% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 434
41% 338 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.1% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 52.7
35% 41.6 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 36
29% 35.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 495
Write 344
Mixed 410
92% 416 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 36.3
128% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 73.2
78% 132 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 134%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: D781
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 27.3
Mixed 27.6
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 4.32
4K Mixed 0.41
155% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 92%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 98.7
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.21
98% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 106
Write 113
Mixed 109
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 0.39
4K Mixed 0.17
52% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback