Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-V (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130201
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '17 at 10:56
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 94.8 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 191 75% 127 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 362 48% 359 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 8428) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.05% Terrible	Lighting 10.1 Reflection 9.35 Parallax 11.6 8% 10.4 fps	MRender 13.5 Gravity 12.2 Splatting 13 11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.05% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 8958278 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 -37941741085096 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2195 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 230 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 29 76 64429490205 (C2) HDA temperature 29 76 64429490205 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8958278 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8958278 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8958278 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11500 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7245 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7245 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7873	64.7% Good	Read 486 Write 182 Mixed 201 63% 290 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 18.1 88% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 42 70% 133 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 87%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 192GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 159 158 5016 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10802 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16183 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10015 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 259 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10802 (C2) HDA temperature 108 97 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 5 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	63.5% Good	Read 118 Write 103 Mixed 90.5 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.88 4K Mixed 0.41 111% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 65%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 139GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 185 167 5733 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9649 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21504 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4829 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 511 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 109 109 273895 (C2) HDA temperature 123 106 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46.8% Average	Read 83.4 Write 79.4 Mixed 78.9 61% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.21 88% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 62GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3 (03) Spinup time 141 135 3916 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6808 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 15025 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2439 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 268 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 151 151 148389 (C2) HDA temperature 117 106 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.3% Good	Read 99.4 Write 114 Mixed 79.3 73% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.19 81% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.7% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 10.2 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 11 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 57.7 69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	228x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	89x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	54x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	32x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $566

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16