Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121018
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '17 at 20:20
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	62%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370E-$471 5,639 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 74.2 1-Core 56.5 2-Core 105 49% 78.5 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 267 28% 226 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB; Asus ROG Strix 1060 6gb CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.78 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30% Below average	Lighting 37.9 Reflection 38.2 Parallax 26.6 31% 34.2 fps	MRender 30.7 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 36 28% 34.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 113 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 27 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 64 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1324054214	46.8% Average	Read 216 Write 172 Mixed 174 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 18.6 86% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 19.1 21% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 134%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 257GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 128 124 4575 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1181 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1813 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 328 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 185 185 46154 (C2) HDA temperature 109 102 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.5% Above average	Read 92.4 Write 93.9 Mixed 90.9 70% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.24 90% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 108GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 72 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896829620 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1367 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 118 118 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7282 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1247 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1367 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1367 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 193274314784 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	71.5% Very good	Read 129 Write 121 Mixed 8.09 62% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.18 66% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 15.5 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.7 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 92.1 43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-S2P Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P - $260

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	75x
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	66x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	39x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	20x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	211x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	95x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	40x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16