PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20160201 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Mar 26 '17 at 14:03 |
Run Duration | 420 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.9%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Palit(1569 1184) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.1%
Good
|
||||
75.2%
Very good
|
||||
USB DISK 2.0 4GB
4GB free, PID 3100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
4.47%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 154x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 109x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 64x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 23x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |