Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	63.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '17 at 17:11
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Memory 94.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 279 87% 159 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 874 85% 699 Pts	64-Core 1,119 69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Lighting 81.5 Reflection 82.5 Parallax 79.5 66% 81.1 fps	MRender 78.1 Gravity 73.1 Splatting 65.1 58% 72.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 960GB-$80 1,195 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 670GB free Firmware: MU01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 631 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 117 (A3) Unknown 100 100 1281 (94) Unknown 100 100 9929 (95) Unknown 100 100 141 (96) Unknown 100 100 0 (97) Unknown 100 100 78 (A4) Unknown 100 100 2006 (A5) Unknown 100 100 18 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 19 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 35326661820441 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 21920 (F2) Unknown 100 100 14968 (F5) Unknown 100 100 23695 (F6) Unknown 100 100 39716 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	51.6% Above average	Read 486 Write 228 Mixed 265 72% 326 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 27.2 4K Mixed 10.6 58% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 30.1 DQ Mixed 36.5 25% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 100%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11343 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2468 (B1) Unknown 96 96 47 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 49 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 730 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24733706046	68.9% Good	Read 498 Write 345 Mixed 349 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 15.7 90% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 36.7 DQ Mixed 12.9 15% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 118%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 175 5758 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2516 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4243 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 891 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 238 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9552 (C2) HDA temperature 125 108 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	72.3% Very good	Read 125 Write 127 Mixed 120 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.28 107% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 89,024 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	MC Read 47.6 MC Write 43.8 MC Mixed 47.4 132% 46.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 22.6 SC Mixed 25.4 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 58.3 69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	835x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	462x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	282x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	148x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	142x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	77x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	49x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $98Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $924

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16