Asrock X370 Killer SLI

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Killer SLI (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '17 at 19:34
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 63.7 1-Core 101 2-Core 178 64% 114 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 676 61% 514 Pts	64-Core 1,049 65% 1,049 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Lighting 39 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 36.4 32% 35.3 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 36 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$81 26,761 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 7 (A5) Unknown 100 100 589829 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 56 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 284 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 56 240519741474 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 4294967297 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 24 (EA) Unknown 100 100 41 (F1) Unknown 253 253 26 (F2) Unknown 253 253 17 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	72.8% Very good	Read 480 Write 237 Mixed 213 68% 310 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 18.1 104% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 40.5 72% 143 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 757GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 178 177 2083 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 9 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 6 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 12 (C2) HDA temperature 114 110 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	98.7% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 169 Mixed 153 124% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.17 4K Write 0.69 4K Mixed 0.09 29% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 109%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60 7,916 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 183GB free Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 83 0 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5541 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 748921135 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 35800 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8685 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 40 589299747 (C2) HDA temperature 35 60 77309411363 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 67 52 113189730 (C5) Current pending sector count 1 1 4294967295 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 1 1 4294967295 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	33% Below average	Read 61.8 Write 53.4 Mixed 50.5 41% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.33 4K Mixed 0.15 27% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB 26,065 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.7% Good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 23.2 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 18.3 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Killer SLI Builds (Compare 403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Killer SLI

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	63x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	55x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	38x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	36x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	35x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	34x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	9x
PSD416G24002 2x16GBPatriotBench 79%, 353 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 111% - Outstanding

Total price: $465

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16