| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150427 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 21 '17 at 18:25 |
| Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
29.4%
Poor
|
34% 54.7 Pts
|
9% 69.6 Pts
|
4% 69.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.9%
Poor
|
29% 32.5 fps
|
28% 35.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
326GB free
Firmware: GG2OAH10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
53.1%
Above average
|
71% 93.7 MB/s
|
61% 0.65 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
105% 140 MB/s
|
65% 0.74 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5584-005.A 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.1%
Very poor
|
15% 5.1 GB/s
|
17% 6.03 GB/s
|
23% 172 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 248 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 30x |
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 27x |
| Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 27x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 28x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 22x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $88 |