Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '17 at 19:41
Run Duration	323 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 75.5 2-Core 147 60% 100 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 419 42% 343 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.1% Above average	Lighting 62.3 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 65 51% 64.6 fps	MRender 73.8 Gravity 60.4 Splatting 57.8 52% 64 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Lacie Rikiki USB 3.0 1TB 252 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 229GB free Firmware: 1053 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 26.7 Mixed 24.4 20% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.02 36% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 59%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 104GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1530 (03) Spinup time 175 170 4233 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1027 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8231 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 397 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 39 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 30940 (C2) HDA temperature 107 97 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	62.8% Good	Read 98.6 Write 120 Mixed 121 86% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.3 114% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 84%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA331 1TB 3,286 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 95 (03) Spinup time 126 126 25790120228 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 605 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 144 144 28 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9182 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 600 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 608 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 608 (C2) HDA temperature 127 127 236224053295 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	59.6% Above average	Read 98.1 Write 110 Mixed 97.2 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.4 92% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 76%
TomTom GPS Music Watch 3GB 296 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	4.71% Terrible	Read 9.15 Write 5.91 Mixed 7.15 9% 7.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.68 47% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.71% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.1% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.7 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16