Biostar TZ77B

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Biostar TZ77B (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '17 at 21:06
Run Duration	392 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 95.3 1-Core 103 2-Core 210 79% 136 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 519 54% 436 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 2667) 3GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Lighting 25.6 Reflection 25.3 Parallax 32.1 21% 27.7 fps	MRender 33.4 Gravity 30.8 Splatting 26.7 24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70 862 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 116 131182651 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 73830487846636 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 179 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 90 (B1) Unknown 0 0 10 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 128 129 545469300864 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 131182651 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 131182651 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 131182651 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 17069 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7714 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7714 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4243	37.6% Below average	Read 193 Write 110 Mixed 112 30% 138 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 13.7 73% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23.2 DQ Write 53.2 DQ Mixed 8 15% 28.1 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 131 131 21493842210 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5903 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 28341 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 194 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5973 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5973 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 227634184230 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	105% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 176 Mixed 163 132% 176 MB/s	4K Read 1.08 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.21 106% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 2,264 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 266GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 26.1 Mixed 28.3 36% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.19 58% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 43%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power128 124GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 87GB free, PID 6000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	48% Average	Read 218 Write 42.4 Mixed 97.2 123% 119 MB/s	4K Read 7.87 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 1.33 133% 3.64 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 55%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 29GB free, PID 5400 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	7.56% Terrible	Read 31.5 Write 3.03 Mixed 4.28 11% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.88 4K Write 0.46 4K Mixed 0.31 40% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.56% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Vulcan 1600 4x4GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 18.6 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 18.8 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 56.1 71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TZ77B Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TZ77B

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	22x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	14x
Core i5-3550Intel $335Bench 69%, 23,599 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	6x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	5x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	5x
Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 52%, 16,472 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $308

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16