Asus P5KC

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P5KC (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080625
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '17 at 16:50
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 71.8 1-Core 34.6 2-Core 68.2 40% 58.2 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 138 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8496) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 347.88 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.98% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3 Parallax 1.91 2% 2.44 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 2.13 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.98% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 302GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 22 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 56 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 11 (F1) Unknown 99 99 400419535	54.2% Above average	Read 248 Write 199 Mixed 199 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 20.6 100% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 37.7 DQ Write 71.8 DQ Mixed 23 26% 44.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 75241184 (03) Spinup time 95 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10441 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 60 4296239056 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6330 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2506 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 53 673120292 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 5146 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 24710 (C2) HDA temperature 36 47 81604378660 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 4964982194721 (F1) Unknown 100 253 7781713271 (F2) Unknown 100 253 7553130671	97.2% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 164 Mixed 97.2 108% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.27 91% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 113%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 466GB free Firmware: GM4OA5CA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 123 123 25789989181 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6421 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 32 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13573 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 6404 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6438 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6438 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 240519413797 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 46 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49.3% Average	Read 89 Write 82.4 Mixed 53.8 56% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.36 107% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 26.3 Mixed 29.3 37% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.62 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.26 94% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.8 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 97.2 41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KC Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KC

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	42x
Xeon X5460Intel $190Bench 52%, 10,360 samples	23x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	20x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	12x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	8x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	8x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
SSDNOW 30GBKingstonBench 19%, 495 samples	5x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	60x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	59x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16