Asus A88XM-A

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-A (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160309
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '17 at 18:57
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119 18,312 User benchmarks, average bench 50% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 51.4 1-Core 54.4 2-Core 95.8 40% 67.2 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 146 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.1 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.6% Average	Lighting 54 Reflection 63.6 Parallax 71.3 44% 63 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 52.9 Splatting 51.8 46% 56.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5575 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1866 (B1) Unknown 94 94 70 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 48 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 19 (EB) Unknown 99 99 539 (F1) Unknown 99 99 19977737746	64% Good	Read 490 Write 282 Mixed 308 79% 360 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 14.1 86% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.7 DQ Write 63.3 DQ Mixed 13.7 20% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 108%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$20 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 191GB free Firmware: 0003SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 78 168892162 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8141 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 30 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 186628110 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9348 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 37 4682 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 5558 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295033013 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 46 504758298 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 2986 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 299 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 73 73 54384 (C2) HDA temperature 26 54 34359738394 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 48 41 168892162 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 7 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	35.3% Below average	Read 71.5 Write 51.7 Mixed 69.3 49% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.23 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.25 55% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 43%
Toshiba MK3261GSYN 320GB-$72 6,986 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 116GB free Firmware: MH000C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1230 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4483 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 10 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 5546 (0A) Spinup retry count 189 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 823 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 54 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 52 572129311 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 33 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1835036 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 48532 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 3 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49.4% Average	Read 82.8 Write 89.2 Mixed 79 63% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.39 100% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.M16 16GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 9 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-A Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-A - $62

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	53x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	39x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	38x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	31x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	31x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	22x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	12x
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 719 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16