Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '17 at 18:47
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 87
2-Core 167
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 326
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 27.2
19% 26.4 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 31
21% 24.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 219
Write 153
Mixed 150
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 14.4
79% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 38.7
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 14
21% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
351GB free
Firmware: 07.04C07 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 82.4
Write 80
Mixed 76.2
60% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.4
108% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 69%
WD My Book 1235 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 138
Write 145
Mixed 141
184% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.28
91% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%
Corsair Voyager 16GB
8GB free, PID 1ab1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
6% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 6.21
Mixed 7.53
13% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.97
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.006
19% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0 Builds (Compare 327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback