Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-M WS (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160921
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '16 at 11:46
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Memory 92 1-Core 102 2-Core 240 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 496 8-Core 789 79% 643 Pts	64-Core 985 61% 985 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.70 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Lighting 41.2 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 38.3 34% 36.9 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 36.1 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Spark 256GB 1,848 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM10.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 41 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 72 72 399 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 96	85.6% Excellent	Read 490 Write 427 Mixed 485 104% 467 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 76.7 4K Mixed 10.7 105% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 16 73% 161 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 628GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 173 173 2325 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 33 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 31 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 25 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 18 (C2) HDA temperature 111 104 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	93.3% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 155 Mixed 146 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.26 4K Write 2.56 4K Mixed 0.35 139% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4x4GB 1,206 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	99.6% Outstanding	MC Read 37.4 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 34.6 110% 38.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 99.6% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	39x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	23x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	17x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	13x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x

SSD
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $210Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
M393A1G40DB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 99%, 225 samples	7x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	6x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $472

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16