PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus F2A55-M LE (all builds) |
Memory | 1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20121022 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Dec 10 '16 at 14:31 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 52% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X4 740K
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.9
|
10.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.6%
Above average
|
||||
53.8%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 4x |
A8-5500 APUAMD $135Bench 48%, 10,478 samples | 4x |
Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
Radeon HD 7540DAMDBench 3%, 4,337 samples | 2x |
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 31% - Below average | Total price: $340 |