PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111012 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 13 '18 at 16:44 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
65.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 324 328 333 340 341 MB/s
|
93.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
138GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 116 116 110 111 MB/s
|
68.4%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
51.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 366x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 238x |
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 166x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 102x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 94x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 88x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $474 |